$ init cliq.dev --verbose

[OK] System initialized

[OK] Loading modules...

> cliq.dev helps product teams get reliable results.

// Join teams from startups to Fortune 500s

$ cat /var/log/reality.txt

The question isn't whether to adopt agents — it's whether your team can get reliable results when they do.

Most can't. Not yet.

[STDERR] Common failure modes:
✗Engineers ask an agent to fix one thing and it breaks ten others.
✗Designers can't get consistent wireframes and mocks.
✗PMs write detailed specs that get ignored.

The agents aren't finishing the job — and no one's sure what they're doing wrong.

Meanwhile, the landscape shifts weekly. New tools, new models, new workflows. It's hard to know what's worth investing in versus what's just noise.

cliq.dev cuts through that.

$ ls -la /skills/agentic-engineering/

What effective agentic engineering actually requires

Getting Agents to Understand You

Agents do what you say, not what you mean.

├─Prompt Engineering
├─Context Engineering
├─Chain-of-Thought Prompting
├─Spec Writing for Agents
├─Task Decomposition
Knowing If the Output Is Good

You can't improve what you can't measure.

├─Evals
├─LLM-as-Judge
├─Best of N
├─Self-Consistency Checks
├─Red Teaming
Building Systems that Compound

One-off prompts don't scale.

├─Prompt Chaining
├─Tool Use
├─Agentic Loops
├─Self-Validating Agents
├─Reflection Patterns
Designing Reliable Workflows

Production requires more than a demo.

├─Multi-step Workflow Definition
├─Human-in-the-Loop Design
├─Failure Recovery & Retry Logic
├─Guardrails
├─Coordination & Integration
Scaling Throughput

Do more without adding headcount.

├─Multi-Agent Orchestration
├─Parallel Execution
├─Remote Sandboxing
$ whoami --verbose

We're senior product managers and engineers who've spent the time separating what works from what doesn't. We embed with your product team — hands-on — to fix what's broken and ship what matters.

> Applying Agentic Workflows

Your team is using agents but not getting the results they expect. We pair with your PMs, engineers, designers, and QA to diagnose why — then fix it by building alongside you.

output: Better prompts, better task breakdown, better workflows. Better results.

No hype. Just experienced practitioners who close the loop.

$ ./contact.sh --init

Get in Touch

+MESSAGE COMPOSE+
>
>
>
>